Thursday, December 8, 2005

Reflection # 3
November 4, 2010
Foreign temporary workers within Canada often expected to leave as quickly as they arrived upon the notice that they themselves have been replaced or the labour they were doing has been adequately completed. These temporary employees are contributors to the Canadian economy by acting in much needed working positions but are being frequently denied permanent citizenship based on unjust premises and judgements. Workers that come to Canada should be viewed as beneficial editions in further developing our economy and general structures of our nation. Placing denial, abuse and burden upon them both devalues them as human beings and presents a notion that the work they do is neither appreciated nor considered valid where their standing as hopeful Canadian immigrants is concerned. The meaning of a worker being temporary has apparently transitioned in the opinion of many employers from regarding a person doing a labour that is momentary to considering an actual worker themselves as having temporary needs and rights. In the article “What Do We Owe Our Guest Workers,” the question of whether the current social contract regarding foreign temporary Canadian workers is in the need of reform. To answer this question, in my opinion, it is crucial to review basic human rights – the ethical, moral principles that the country of Canada ideally accepts and bases its decisions on. It must be realized that although it is overly optimistic to believe all foreign temporary workers could (and should) be easily admitted as immigrants to Canada, the idea that when they are working within this country’s borders they should be treated with respect, dignity, be given proper safety precautions necessary for their job, and a chance to be considered for a permanent opportunity to live and build a life in Canada should be a given assumption rather than a matter up for debate or inquisition. Temporary is not a synonym for disposable. When Canadian citizens typically partake in temporary jobs they are commonly viewed as apprenticeships, building work experience, exploring options or settling for the time being within our current society. However, why is it when people from foreign countries sign up for temporary working positions in Canada does their contract frequently become a means to treat them with disregard and place assumptions upon them that once they are no longer particularly useful or irreplaceable within our labour force they are not simply given the option to return back to their country, they are expected to. Canadian crops, care aids, restaurants, infrastructure and construction are all essential elements of the Canadian economy, it is imperative that the positions required to keep all of these areas continuously maintained and growing are filled and done correctly. But why are those who often fulfill these occupations, in the case of foreign temporary workers, not receiving the same treatment of importance as we give the labours themselves? The actuality that farm workers under the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program are not given the option to apply for immigrant status at all precisely demonstrates that many Canadian employers consider SAWP workers, among other foreign temporary workers, as interchangeable as the crops they pick, burgers they flip, and infrastructure they build in our country. The reality is that many of these workers are contributing more to Canada’s economy and progression that a lot of the citizens are who are formerly residing. Much of the current population do not work yet receive government benefits – and furthermore those who commit criminal offenses and wrongdoings within the nation of Canada are often citizens, yet are deteriorating the country instead of working to build its economy and structure. One of the arguments presented in the article “What Do We Owe Our Guest Workers,” is that temporary workers surpassing a time period of two years in a consistent labour field of agriculture should be eligible for the application process of permanent Canadian citizenship status. It is my thinking that after an individual has worked in a challenging and important labour such as agriculture, it is obvious that they have contributed to society and made a significant impact on the growth of our countries production for the better. If they were to receive full citizenship, their work ethic would only improve because they would be labouring to better not just Canada – but their own country.

Wednesday, December 8, 2004

Reflection #4
November 18, 2010

For my final reflection in this class I have chosen to discuss my perspective of that stated in the assigned reading “Good Muslin, Bad Muslim: A Political Perspective on Culture and Terrorism.” I found that the idea brought forth that in Western society perceives that there are Muslims who are “bad” – those that pose a threat and participate in extreme, immoral acts such as terrorism; and Muslims that are “good” – who in turn fight against the “bad” ones. There are several aspects I find disturbing about these generalizations. First, the idea that a culture can only be explicitly good or bad not only displays ignorant thinking but applies rigid stereotypes to groups that may collectively have understood religious views but practice them, along with other elements of their lives in contrasting ways. Secondly, this extreme division on Muslim people is racist on the part of the West. For example, many criminals who have committed unspeakable acts of violence claim to be of the Christian faith yet we do not classify the prominent majority of Christians as simply one way or another. Why is this? According to the article “Good Muslin, Bad Muslim: A Political Perspective on Culture and Terrorism,” the fact that the experience of one’s religion is being placed into a political context in an effort to order it according to Western standards has a great deal to do with the classification that unjustly occurs. In regards to the mention of September 11th and how it affected the perception Westerners have about the relation between Islam people and acts of terrorism, I found the concept of “culture talk,” that was mentioned to present great insight into the way that a correlation is frequently placed between Islam and terrorism. A true understanding of the Muslim faith is not a reality for many individuals that make-up Western society. Because of this political aspects are inappropriately placed on extreme ideas of what differing, minority (in our culture), religions represent. The reality that one’s chosen religion or nationality is simply a part of who an individual is, and does not define the entire being is a concept that pertains to both an understanding of diversity and a willingness comprehend on a level greater than pre-existing common knowledge or simple stereotypes. Few things in life where people, politics and religion are concerned are explicitly one way or another. Categorizing a person, political ideal or policy or religious outlook cannot be done effectively where territory is involved. Mamdani (2002) states that culture is not territorial as political units are. Culture is a representation of something that is a part of an individual and is extremely personal. Placing political context upon that which is a persons’ culture is offensive especially when historical events, issues and societal developments are ignored in an effort to simplify explanations of the political outcomes of “traditionally modelled” cultures. It is my personal belief that blame and extreme negative connotations were placed upon Islamic people directly after September 11th because people needed to hold someone or something accountable. The fear, anger, hatred and confusion following the 9/11 terrorist attacks made individuals want to seek a problem – so they could have something to fix. Through targeting the specific cultural group of Islamic people a way to form opinions and action concerning the reasoning behind what happened on September 11th was presented. The problem of the destruction that took place in the United States due to the terrorist attacks was not then and will never be fixable. The closest many will come to feeling as though they are fighting back against the terrorism that murdered a part of their Western existence is killing the culture of others.

Monday, December 6, 2004

Final Thoughts


How law enforcement views diversity can only change if and when people want it to. With enough protest, increased awareness and positive action towards equality a difference can be made sooner rather then later.

The examples and theories presented in this blog are just a start in the movement to end unfair treatment of minorities in respect to the stereotypes of those who are accused of or in actuality commit crime and receive punishment.

Crime in a way is a necessary and inevitable aspect of society however, racism is not. This blog is a resource for learning about the importance of respecting diversity, and eliminating the hierarchy of race in the order of crime and punishment.

The perspectives of all who either agree or disagree with the take I have delivered regarding the treatment of minorities by authority in modern society is important and welcome on this site.




Hopefully one day we can lock up racism for good.

Sunday, December 5, 2004

Marking Rubric for Weblog — 45%

1. Presentation 5 marks
a) Is your home page organized clearly?
b) Is your blog easy to navigate?
c) Does it appear professional?


2. External links linked to course 10 marks
a) Do you make the most of the blog’s capacity as an interactive online
tool?
b) Do you display different multimedia and incorporate them into your
work?
c) Do you demonstrate your research capabilities through linking to
relevant outside sites?


3. Three short reviews 15 marks
a) Is your writing clear and concise?
b) Do you link your discussion to course themes?
c) Do you fully integrate your reviews into your blog?


4. Engagement 15 marks
a) Do you demonstrate evidence of a deep engagement with course
concepts and material?
b) Do you demonstrate research skills and analytical observations linked
to everyday phenomena